torsdag 17. november 2011

Looting in London

·         What is the difference between looting and rioting?
o   The main difference in looting and rioting is that looting does not involve as much physical violence as rioting. Instead of roaming around looking only for violence, you just smash some windows and steal clothes and other goods.
·         Define the underlined (blue) words and phrases. Also note down other words you find difficult, and find out what they mean.
o   Catalyst of unrest: Something that first sparks unrest in a society.
Consumerism: The theory of it being good to have, and that the consumers interests are the most important thing.
Lack of intervention: Too few people take action to prevent someone or something.
Opportunism: When you take advantage of an opportunity without thinking much of consequences or how you affect others.
Criminologist: One who studies crime and criminals and it’s relation to society.
High-Unemployment: Many people do not have jobs, and often can’t get jobs.
Disregard social norms: When you deliberately break social norms for personal gain.
Social Exclusion: When the minority is “cast out” or “forgot” by the majority in the society.
·         Could this happen in Trondheim? In Oslo? Why/why not?
o   No. Unemployment and crimes in general are much less common in Norway, and it is way too low for something like this to happen. The conditions for being unemployed in Norway are also very good, even though you don’t have a job you can manage fine on the welfare system.
·         What can this say about the social conditions in England? How may this be connected to the traditional class system?
o   This can be closely related to the English class system because most of the people participating probably are in the workers class, (an upper class wouldn’t need to loot) and it can tell us that the workers class is in a struggle, and that there is too few jobs for all the people in the workers class.

søndag 23. oktober 2011

Travel blog to New Zealand


16th of October 2011
Today was my travel day. I have been on some pretty long flights in my life but this is the longest I have ever gone. New Zealand is approximately the most opposite country of Norway you can find. The time difference is 10 hours, and on top of that New Zealand is pretty far south. All in all the whole day was spent traveling, luckily I got some sleep at the plane so I’m not that bad.
17th of October 2011
Today I arrived at my hotel in Wellington, the capitol of New Zealand. Wellington is on the southern tip of the northern island, which makes it an ideal place to visit both islands. Since I arrived about in the middle of the afternoon I did not have much time to do anything special, so I decided to go sightseeing around town. Since Wellington is considered one of the culture centers I, after going to the national museum, visited a local music bar to see if there was anything interesting. The bar itself was a nice place, and the people were nice too, but the music wasn’t the best I’ve heard. Greg and Diana (two people I met at the bar) said that the music isn’t exactly the best, but that they sometimes get in some really good people. Since I hadn’t decided what to do the next day, Greg and Diana decided to show me some places worth seeing.
18th of October 2011
Today was mostly spent following Diana and Greg’s orders. We went sightseeing around the Northern Island, and went Hiking up into the mountains. On the way we saw some very good lookout ridges and I got to take some really nice pictures with my camera. I also sighted a Kiwi bird! Which has been one of the things I’ve been looking forward to the most. After a long day spent hiking and driving I got some well-deserved rest at the hotel before Greg and Diana dragged me out to town to go to a club.
19th-21st of October
I left Wellington for now to go look at some of the places were scenes from Lord of the Rings were shot. Some of these places were just extraordinary it’s not often I can set my eyes on such a sight. You could even see the resemblance from the movies. All tough I do feel a tad bit lonely.
22rd of October
 After pretty much visiting all the natural sites during the last three days on the 22nd I decided to go back to Wellington and spend my last day with Greg and Diana, since they had nothing to do at the time they were more than willing to take me out to Wellington to shop. After getting some souvenirs and some new clothes we decided to go out clubbing again, and meet some more of their friends. They were all really nice and we all had a great time.
23rd of October
Today I spent the morning watching the finals in the Rugby world cup, it was a pretty heated game but New Zealand won it in the end. I just tried to follow the game, but my new made friends were ecstatic. Afterwards I had to say goodbye, I promised to keep contact with Greg and Diana and started making my way back home. I hope I can come back to New Zealand sometime.

fredag 7. oktober 2011

Sjakk på PC

Artikkel utdrag:
Sjakk på PC-en har nå blitt et nytt problem for lærere i skolen. Selv om internettet er stengt på de nye skole PC-ene går det fortsatt å spille på de spillene som allerede er kommet inn via Windows 7. «Det er vanskelig å få kontakt med elevene.» Uttalte en lærer ved Trondheim Katedralskole i VG for to dager siden. Men elevene har et annet synspunkt på saken: «Når jeg spiller sjakk i noen minutter våkner jeg og blir mer fokusert, og det blir lettere å fokusere etterpå.» Så Øystein Nicolay Diserud ved Adolf Øien skole i Trondheim som en respons til dette.
Skjønnlitterær tekst:
Timen var kjedelig. Ikke bare hadde læreren den mest monotone stemmen jeg noen sinne hadde hørt. En perfekt måte å starte videregående på. Etter ti minutter klarte jeg simpelthen ikke å holde meg våken. Jeg måtte finne en type underholdning. Jeg bannet inni meg selv når jeg så at internettet var blokkert. Da begynte jeg å svipe gjennom spillene på PC-en. Det eneste som var der var sjakk. Jeg har aldri vært noen sjakkspiller men det var det eneste som kunne redde meg nå.  Starten var det kjedelig, men etter en stund begynte jeg å komme inn i flyten. Når jeg var halvveis fant jeg ut at jeg var lys våken. Endelig en redning.

torsdag 29. september 2011

Blood diamonds

Blood diamonds is one of the bbest movies i have seen in a while. The action filled plot and the sadening truthfull theme both worked very well together. All in all the movie shows the reality of those who lived in Sierra Leone at the time. The RUF's child soliders and how they were forced to kill and raid villagers across the country. The diamonds that everybody wanted for their own, so they could sell it and make extreme profits. The civil war, and how many people chose to make somebody else's life worse to improve their own. It was kind of sad when Danny Archer said TIA about it all, which just shows how he has given up on making it all better. Almost like saying: "This is how the country is, and how it always will be no matter what we do." The in-detail description of how diamond smugglers got the "conflict-diamonds" out on the market was also very good. Even though the movie was fiction, it also portrayed many realities about this world. Child soliders stil excist in large numbers. Conflict diamonds are still smuggled into the western diamond market, and families still get separated because of all of this. A sad and cold truth.

God argumentering

Det aller aller viktigste man må kunne når man argumenterer er å være så saklig som mulig hele tiden. Hvis man blir for emosjonell kan man virke desperat og derfor også tom for gode argumenter. Derimot hvis du kan holde deg rolig og rasjonell til en hver tid er det mye lettere å vinne et argument. Selvsagt er det også viktig å ha en viss kunnskap om hva du prater om. En annen viktig ting er Kreativitet. Under et argument kan man være så forberedt som overhodet mulig, men det kan forsatt være noe du har oversett som motstanderen kan bruke imot deg. Da er det viktig å være kreativ og kjapp i replikken slik at du kan komme med et motargument på sparket. Det siste jeg vil påpeke, er at det å få det siste ordet kan påvirke argumentet ekstremt. Noen sa en gang til meg: "Den som får det siste ordet vinner alltid et argument." Så gikk personen for å snakke med noen andre. Selv om det siste ordet er viktig, er det ikke sikkert at du vinner argumentet. Men hvis du med mindre sparer det beste argumentet ditt til slutt kan det være en stor sjanse for at du går "seirende" ut av diskusjonen.

About Myself

Alright, since this is a subject blogg i have to put up both English and Norwegian posts.
I am a 16 year old boy from Trondheim, Norway. Im a sporty guy who trains both Taekwon-Do and Football. I've also won second place in the National Championship in Taekwon-Do last year and i am going for gold this year. I have Football played for as many years as i can remeber, and i've played on the team Trygg/Lade all my life. We used to be quite good back in the days, but have now fallen pretty far as many of our best players have moved on to other teams. I don't like saying things about my personality, because i don't want to seem overconfident and "douchy", which might mean i am a pretty carefull guy. The most exciting thing in my life is that i have been living in the US for a year. In eight grade i was living in Madison, Wisconsin, going to a public school there. To be honest, that was the best school i have ever been to. I have never had such good results or worked so hard in my life. In addition to that, the High School i would have gone to if i hadn't left was supposed to be even better. Now i am crossing my fingers that my years at Adolf Øien 1ste will be even better. :)

About the Butterflies

To be honest, I don't think the literary analysis "About the Butterflies" was such an extremely good analysis. It's good yes, but there are still some important things the writer could improve.
First of all i think the author could be a little more informative in her intro. He/she only gives info about the short story itself, but not what he/she is going to talk about at all. It helps to give the reader a little hint of what the whole point of the analysis is. What is it you want to explain to us about the short story? Is it racial issues, or sheep, or maybe even cabbage farmers? Personally i felt kind of thrown into the whole thing without knowing what i was going to meet. However, the arguments the author of the analysis came up with in the analysis were very good. He/she finds the key parts of the story and helps us to understand it. Though at some points there could have been a little more detail.
Secondly, even though the author seemed to have a very good vocabulary, at some parts it felt like the explanations came to some abrupt stops, and ruined the flow of the text. And the transitions between paragraphs were sometimes confusing. But generally the language was really good, and it was easy to read.
All in all though, the analysis was good because: The the writer of the analysis really grabbed on to the essence of the story and managed to tell us in a good, straight forward manner, he/she also generally had good language and his/her vocabulary was broad. But like everyone else he/she has some things to work on.

fredag 23. september 2011

Få meg på, for whaaat?

På torsdag for mesteparten av klassen på kino for å se Få meg på, for faen, og jeg må si: Dette er en av de kleineste og rareste tenåringsfilmene jeg noen gang har sett. La gå, jeg har ikke sett så veldig mange tenåringsfilmer, men det forandrer ikke det faktum at selve plottet og problemet i filmen er helt latterlig. Helt seriøst, "Han tok pikken sin på låret mitt. Sånn her." Hvordan kan en så liten ting bety så mye? Men selv om plottet og problemet er rett og slett dumt, er temaet helt greit. Det skjer mange steder at folk blir utstøtt, og det er en viktig ting. Jeg synes bare at de skulle funnet en annen måte å fremstille det på.